|
A
Summarization
of the
Presidential Candidates views on
Health Care Issues
The New
England Journal of Medicine dated October 19, 2000, includes a
"sounding board" of the presidential candidates' views on
health care issues. I will summarize and comment on a number of their
proposals.
Both candidates focus on
the national embarrassment of uninsured children. The most vulnerable
group remains those children in families not eligible for Medicaid and
too poor for private insurance (11,000,000 children). Currently, the
State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) is a federal program
providing state block grants to expand affordable care. Governor Bush
would allow the states greater flexibility in using the money to expand
coverage, but does not espouse enlarging the expenditures to this
program. The Vice President would expand the program to cover all
children in families up to 250% of the poverty level, and give a 25% tax
credit to all families for insurance coverage above this income group.
Neither candidate has a plan providing universal coverage to children
under any proposal.
The proposed coverage for
the parents of children on the SCHIP program, and for all adults in
general, is incremental. Governor Bush offers a "Family health
Credit", a voucher of up to $2000 per year, to any family making
less than $30,000 per year. This credit is alleged to cover 90% of the
purchase cost of a health insurance policy. Many disagree that the
dollar value of this voucher is adequate. For individuals not eligible
for this program, based on their income, he will promote expansion of
employee-based insurance programs for small businesses. These businesses
will be encouraged to conglomerate into purchasing groups to obtain
better rates for coverage.
Governor Bush will
support the expansion of medical savings accounts as an alternative
approach.
The Vice President would
expand SCHIP to cover adults at or below the 250% poverty level. Above
this income bracket, he proposes a 25% tax credit to individuals and to
employers offering health coverage. The Vice President desires expansion
of Medicare allowing individuals aged 55-65 to buy into the program.
The Vice President does
not offer a view on the perpetuation of medical savings accounts as an
alternative approach to coverage.
Universal coverage for
adults is avoided by both candidates. Governor Bush is hopeful that
insurance buying conglomerates for small businesses and MSAs may fill
part of the gap for the uninsured. The Vice President is including
younger patients on Medicare but leaves a gap for many adults younger
than age 55 that are above the 250% poverty level. Universal coverage
remains too complex and politically risky for any candidate to approach.
Prescription drug
coverage for Medicare patients remains a critical election issue.
Governor Bush's program is entitled "MedicaRXes" (Medicare
choice and Access to Prescription Drugs for Every Senior.) It covers all
prescriptions for drugs at the 135% poverty level and pays 25% for all
drugs above the 175% poverty level. He would limit the out of pocket
expenses of seniors to $6,000 per year.
The Vice President would
limit all out of pocket expenses for prescriptions to $4000 and cover
50% of the prescription cost to $5000. Unlike his opponent, Vice
President Gore would segregate Medicare funds into a "locked
box" sequestering this portion of the Medicare surplus for future
expenditures.
Both candidates favor the
patient bill of rights and improvements in the quality of care and
reduction of medical errors (apple pie and motherhood).
Whoever
sits in the Oval Office after Election Day will have difficult choices
regarding the future of medical care to address. For now, incremental
expansion of insurance coverage but not universal coverage is the goal.
Medicare recipients can expect subsidies but not a free ride on
prescription coverage.
And as for physicians,
what's ahead? The Medicare surplus grows larger, as a consequence of our
hard work. The funds may end up in a "locked box" if Vice
President Gore is the winner, but we don't have the key.
David
Eskreis, MD

| Original
Time Periods for No-Fault Claims Still in Effect |
The New York State
Department of Insurance (SID) has taken two distinct actions in response
to the June 9, 2000 Supreme Court decision by Justice Gangel-Jacobs
which declared the new no-fault regulations null and void on the grounds
that the regulations were issued without a Regulatory Impact Statement
and were in violation of the State Administrative Procedure Act.
The new no-fault
regulations would shorten the time period for an automobile accident
victim to notify the no-fault carrier of an accident from 90 days to 30
days. In addition, the shortened time period for a covered person, or a
physician assigned the no-fault benefits, to submit proof of a claim for
medical services would be 45 days instead of the original 180 days.
The SID has taken
the following actions:
filed an
appeal of Justice Gangel-Jacobs' decision and
issued a new regulation which is identical to the previous
regulation with the exception that it includes the required Regulatory
Impact Statement
The MSSNY is a
plaintiff in the original litigation opposing these shortened
notification periods and has also issued a statement in opposition to
this new identical regulation promulgated by the SID.
Physicians
should be aware that until the Insurance Department wins its appeal or
the Supreme Court rules in favor of the new regulation, the original
90/180 day notification periods remain in effect.
The
Society will keep its members apprised of any new events in this matter.

| Insurance
Department Fines against HMO's Total $575,000 |
Superintendent of Insurance Neil D. Levin
announced on October 18, that the Dept. of Insurance has once again
levied fines against 21 health insurers and HMOs totaling $575,000 for
violations of the state's Prompt Pay Law. The fines paid in this, the
fifth round of prompt pay fines, exceed the total fines paid in all of
the previous four rounds. This is in keeping with the warning given by
superintendent Levin to the industry earlier this year. In an earlier
press release and Circular Letter number 6, both issued on January 27,
2000, the Superintendent advised that the Insurance Department would be
intensifying its investigation of prompt pay violations and seeking
tougher penalties for the insurers that have repeatedly violated the
statute.
The current fines by company are:
CIGNA
Healthcare of NY
Connecticut General Life
Empire BC/BS of Grtr NY
Excellus Health Plan
Group Health Plan (GHI)
Guardian Life of America
Healthcare Plan (Univera)
Healthfirst
Healthnow New York
Healthsource of NY/NJ
Health Ins. Plan of NY (HIP)
Independent Health Assoc.
MDNY Healthcare
Metropolitan Life Ins.
NYLCare Health Plans of NY
OXFORD
Physicians Health Svc. of NY
Prudential Healthcare of NY
United Healthcare of NY
US Healthcare
Vytra Health Services |
$
15,000
$ 1,700
$ 16,000
$ 2,750
$ 29,850
$ 1,200
$ 2,750
$ 1,000
$ 28,500
$ 1,000
$ 37,000
$ 6,500
$ 5,000
$ 18,000
$ 12,750
$215,000
$ 5,500
$ 18,000
$ 7,000
$116,000
$ 34,500 |
The companies listed have paid fines imposed by
the Department. They also acknowledge that they failed to pay claims
promptly and agree to put corrective measures in place to avoid future
violations.
In addition to paying the fines, the law also
requires the HMO's and insurance companies pay interest on late claims
at the greater of 12 percent per year, or the corporate tax rate as set
by the Commissioner of Taxation and Finance. The stipulation also
mandates that all claims requiring the payment of interest be reported
to the Department.
Since the law went into effect in January, 1998,
the Department has received over 67,500 prompt pay complaints. To
register a prompt pay complaint, you can call the Department's toll-free
hot line at 1-800-358-9260.

| Tobacco
Company Sues New York |
Brown and Williamson Tobacco Corp. last
week filed suit in federal court against the state of New York over a
new law that bans mail-order, telephone and Internet sales of
cigarettes. The New York law was passed earlier this year and is set to
go into effect next month.
The law bans sales practices that
"make it easier for children to get cigarettes and for smokers to
dodge the sales tax," according to legislators. But Brown and
Williamson said the law "interferes with interstate commerce, and
accuses the state of engaging in 'impermissible economic protectionism
at its most flagrant." David Remes, the tobacco
company's attorney, said the case is "the first of its kind in the
country and has implications beyond" the tobacco industry. Remes
added, "if all 50 states try to dictate their own rules for
e-commerce, it will be difficult for e-commerce to flourish."
Joseph Conway, spokesman for Governor
Pataki, said, "The law is an important public health measure that
will help save lives by preventing young people from obtaining
cigarettes illegally. We're confident that the law is constitutional and
that the lawsuit will be unsuccessful. "

| Some
Insurers Agree to Cover RU-486 Pill |
Health insurers have generally agreed to cover the
newly approved RU-486 abortion pill, according to a survey of leading
managed care plans. Heavyweights Aetna, United HealthCare and Cigna,
will cover the abortion pill as a standard benefit.
A price has not been established by Mifeprex,
although including doctor visits and counseling, it is expected to cost
about the same as a surgical abortion, about $700. The difference
between the abortion pill and other new drugs is that it is only
dispensed directly from a physician's office and not through a pharmacy.
Thus plans such as United have decided to cover the abortion pill as a
standard medical benefit, rather than a drug benefit.
| National
Childhood Vaccine Injury Act |
NEWS FROM
NASSAU COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
ITS FEDERAL LAW!
You must give your patients current vaccine
information statements under the new law. Before a health care provider
vaccinates a child or an adult with a dose of DtaP, DTP, Td, MMR,
varicella, polio, Hib or hepatitis B vaccine, the provider is required
by the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA) to provide a copy
of the Vaccine Information Statement (VIS) to either the adult vaccinee
or to the child's parent/legal guardian. The use of the VIS has been
required since 1994.
VIS's are also available for influenza,
pneumococcal and hepatitis A vaccines. Their use is recommended but not
required by federal law. They are not required because these additional
vaccines are not routinely recommended for children and, therefore, are
not covered by the NCVIA.
According to the law, before administering the
vaccine, you must give the patient or parent/guardian a copy of the most
current VIS available for that vaccine. The patient should have time to
read the VIS prior to administration of the vaccine. You must also
record in the patient's chart the date that the VIS was given as well as
the publication date of the VIS as appears on the bottom of the VIS. VIS
forms are available from the following:
The CDC web site at http://www.cdc.gov/nip/publications/
or from the Nassau County Department of Health Immunization Action
Program at 571-1680.
| OIG
Issues Final Compliance Guidance for MD's |
Health and Human Services' Office of Inspector
General has issued final guidance to help physicians in individual and
small group practices design voluntary compliance programs. "The
intent of the guidance is to provide a road map to develop a voluntary
compliance program that best fits the needs of that individual practice.
The guidance itself provides great flexibility as to how a physician
practice could implement compliance efforts in a manner that fits with
the practice's existing operations and resources," IG June Gibbs
Brown said. "We are encouraging physician practices to adopt the
active application of compliance principals in their practice, rather
than implement rigid, costly, formal procedures." Unlike other
comparable OIG guidance, the Compliance Program Guidance for individual
and small group physician practices does not suggest that physician
practices implement all seven standard components of a full-scale
compliance program. Rather, it emphasized a step-by-step approach to
follow in developing and implementing a voluntary compliance program.
The Medical Society has developed a CME program on
this topic which will be presented at the NCMS on December 13, from
6-9PM. Use the registration form on page 8 to register for this
important program.

| Interpreters
now Mandatory under Title VI |
According to new guidelines issued by the US Dept.
of Health and Human Services, effective immediately, physicians who
accept reimbursement by Medicare and Medicaid qualify as
recipient/covered entities and are obligated to provide foreign language
interpreters for all their Limited English Proficiency (LEP) patients.
Although the Office of Civil Rights
(OCR) will focus compliance review on large entities, such as hospitals,
this does not mean that the small practitioner can neglect his
obligations under Title VI. The OCR will investigate all complaints or
reports alleging possible noncompliance. However, the OCR will make its
assessment of the type of language assistance needed on a case-by-case
basis, focusing on whether the LEP patient and the physician can
communicate effectively. To do this , the OCR will take into
consideration factors such as the size of the medical practice, group v.
solo practitioner, cost of providing the interpreter, and the community
serviced by the physician.
The OCR has assured the Society that, although
this matter is rarely pursued, should a complaint be received, the
matter will first be discussed and technical assistance provided before
any legal action would be taken.

|
|
| Use
Correct Billing Code for Medicaid Fee Increase |
Just a reminder - the new Medicaid fees for
selected E&M services became effective on October 1. The affected
codes are 99201-99205, 99211-99215, 99381-99385, and 99391-99395. All
these codes are payable, by Medicaid, at $30.
The $30 is payable based on the code, not based on
physician specialty. Remember, if you are billing Medicaid
Fee-for-Service for care to a recipient and billing any of the twenty
office visit codes, bill at $30. If the physician bills the old
fees for these codes, the only way to get the $30 due, will be to submit
an adjustment to the Medicaid Program.
For provider enrollment clarification, please call
the NYS-DOH Office of Medicaid Management Helpline at 1-800-541-2831. If
you need claim forms for billing purposes, you will need to contact
Computer Sciences Corporation, the state's intermediary at
1-800-522-5535.

| Toll
Free Telephone Access for Medicare Physicians |
HCFA has announced new toll free telephone numbers
effective October 1, 2000.
| GHI
- Medicare |
1-877-868-7965
|
| Empire
Medicare Svcs.
|
1-877-869-6504
|

Norman S. Amer, MD, Thoracic
and Cardiovascular Surgeon at Peninsula Hospital Center has been named
honoree of the 93rd Anniversary Ball along with fellow surgeon Alvin J.
Slovin, MD Chief of Thoracic Surgery. Both Dr. Amer and Dr. Slovin are
being honored for the devotion, caring and clinical expertise they give
their patients and for their outstanding service to the hospital, both
as esteemed physicians and skillful leaders.
Richard S. Blum, MD,
has been appointed to serve as a Special Government Employee Expert
Consultant to the FDA and recently served on its Gastrointestinal
Advisory Panel. Dr. Blum also recently represented the Medical Society
at the International Convention of the United States Pharmacopoeia.

Alfred Lubart, MD,
a Life member of the Society died recently in Danbury, CT. Dr. Lubart
was elected to membership in 1953 following graduation from NY Medical
College in 1948, an internship at Morrisania City Hospital and a
fellowship at Meadowbrook Hospital. Dr. Lubart practiced Internal
Medicine in Long Beach until his retirement. He is survived by his wife
Hilda, three children and seven grandchildren.
Wallace T. Smith, MD,
a Life member of the Society died on October 15. Dr. Smith joined the
Society in 1935 after graduating from Cornell University Medical College
in 1933 and interning at Nassau Hospital.
John Swinburne, MD,
a member of the Society died on September 26. Dr. Swinburne had been a
member since 1977 and was a 1966 graduate of Upstate Medical Center,
SUNY. He practiced Plastic Surgery in Garden City. He is survived by his
wife Janet, and three children.
Paul V. Wayne, MD,
a Life member of the Society, died on October 5. Dr. Wayne joined the
NCMS in 1953 as a transfer from Kings County where he had been a member
after graduating from the University of Berne, Switzerland, in 1935. Dr.
Wayne interned at City Hospital, Welfare Island and at NYC Hospital. He
practiced General Medicine in Long Beach until his retirement. He is
survived by his wife Sylvia, two sons and one grandchild.
The Society offers its condolences to the families
and friends of all departed members.

Holds
National Databank Hearing
|
|
|
|
October
2000
In
the News This Month...
|
|
|
|